What interaction strategy would be least effective when an employee has the authority to lead a team?

When considering interaction strategies for an employee with the authority to lead a team, the least effective approach would be using an involving strategy. This strategy often emphasizes collaboration and soliciting input from team members, which can dilute the authority of the leader. A leader who's supposed to steer a project or guide a team may find that constantly seeking input can slow down decision-making, create confusion around leadership roles, and ultimately hinder the team's effectiveness.

In contrast, a convincing strategy involves persuading team members, which allows the leader to maintain authority while still engaging with the team. A supporting strategy focuses on providing assistance and encouragement, which can help build morale and foster a productive environment without undermining leadership. Similarly, a directing strategy allows a leader to clearly communicate expectations and instructions, which aligns well with their role as a team leader.

Overall, when authority is present in team leadership, strategies that resonate with clear guidance and motivation tend to yield more effective results than those that heavily involve the team in decision-making processes.