What interaction strategy would likely be used to obtain board approval for a well-tested new procedure suggested by a committee?

The convincing strategy is particularly suitable for obtaining board approval for a well-tested new procedure suggested by a committee because it focuses on presenting logical arguments, evidence, and data to persuade decision-makers. In this context, the committee would leverage the strength of the well-tested nature of the procedure, showcasing its benefits and the research or results that back its implementation. This approach emphasizes rationality and a structured presentation of facts that can alleviate concerns and garner support from the board.

In contrast, the other interaction strategies would not be as effective in this scenario. The involving strategy, while collaborative, may not capitalize on the established merits of the new procedure and could lead to unnecessary discussions that detract from the core purpose. The directing strategy emphasizes top-down communication, which may come across as overly authoritative when seeking approval for a procedure that has already undergone thorough testing and experience within the committee. Supporting strategy focuses on providing assistance or resources but does not actively advocate for a specific decision or outcome, which is essential when seeking formal approval from the board.