What should the post-tournament review documentation include?

The post-tournament review documentation should include a basic review that details both successes and failures. This comprehensive analysis is essential as it allows the organizers to understand what worked well and what aspects of the tournament may need improvement. By documenting the successes, the team can identify best practices and strategies that contributed to a positive outcome, which can be replicated in future events. Conversely, acknowledging failures is equally important, as it highlights areas for growth and development, enabling the team to address any challenges encountered during the tournament. This reflective process not only aids in improving future tournaments but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement within the organizing team.

While the winning score, a financial report, and player feedback are valuable information pieces, they do not encompass the breadth of analysis that a thorough review entails. Focusing exclusively on just one of these elements would not provide a complete picture of the tournament’s overall success and areas needing attention.