What strategy is appropriate for resolving a member's reluctance to endorse a tournament format change?

The convincing strategy is effective when addressing a member's reluctance to endorse a tournament format change because it focuses on persuading the individual by providing logical reasoning, potential benefits, and addressing any concerns they may have. This approach helps to clarify the advantages of the new format, such as enhancing participation, improving competitiveness, or aligning with evolving player preferences.

Engaging members in a dialogue where their opinions are taken into consideration may alleviate their concerns, but the emphasis of the convincing strategy is about presenting compelling arguments and data that can help change minds and garner support. This strategy reinforces the importance of effectively communicating the value of the change to overcome resistance and achieve buy-in from skeptical members.